[OSM-dev] API 0.3 - Map call - Summary
SteveC
steve at asklater.com
Tue Mar 14 15:20:33 GMT 2006
* @ 14/03/06 01:39:01 PM steve at asklater.com wrote:
> * @ 14/03/06 01:17:35 PM Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> > Where Way id's 39 and 40 have been deleted. Is this a feature? If not
> > required should be removed to reduce unnecessary overhead?
>
> /me screams BUG
>
> So early on in writing the api calls I figured you could consider a way
> with no segs as deleted. So that particular SQL call isn't looking at
> the 'visible' field. Will fix.
Right, I think it's fixed.
have fun,
SteveC steve at asklater.com http://www.asklater.com/steve/
More information about the dev
mailing list