[OSM-dev] Relationships - working prototype

[David Earl]

On 16/08/2007 11:25, spaetz wrote:
>> grouping ways, then if a generic term is wanted "group" might be better, 
>> or to make it less generic, "waygroup" or "way-group".
> 
> But that would be not so appropriate for e.g. turn restrictions, wouldn't it? 
 > I like "relations" personally, but then I don't care how they are
 > called actually.

Yes, it would. The turn restriction in Fred's model groups two ways: the 
"from" way and the "to" way. But as you say, the name's not vital, and 
I'd happily go with "relations" too.

David