[OSM-dev] ways with 'spurs'
Robert (Jamie) Munro
rjmunro at arjam.net
Mon Feb 26 12:13:22 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Hart wrote:
>
>> IMHO, not if they're the same road, there's no point. I live in a
>> cul-de-sac with fork in it, and it would be stupid to have to tag it
>> twice, especially if this meant the name was rendered twice.
> Osmarender
>
> You don't have to tag it twice. Just create both ways. Select them both,
> and then tag. (in general tag names individually, but apply highway etc.
> tags in groups)
That /is/ tagging it twice. It puts duplicate data in the database. If I
make a spelling mistake (or there is an offical change of name or
status), it has to be fixed it twice etc. (yes I know I can fix it twice
in one go if I am using the right tools, but that's not the point).
The data model has this flexibility built in. It just seems stupid to
not use it.
Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF4s7ez+aYVHdncI0RAsX4AKC3vpWqxbD+7Y4KliYm21uJj6YLLACeIZpC
VNElrI5RWQ2/jgWFMJoNyzI=
=5eTw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dev
mailing list