[OSM-dev] dropping segments

Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-list at deelkar.net
Fri Jul 27 16:44:54 BST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Good plan. Reducing triviality, here are some issues:
> 
> 1. Branched and disconnected ways can be found and, mostly, remedied  
> even today. Same with tagged segments and unwayed segments. So  
> instead of breaking them up and then putting them on a Wiki page, we  
> could do that today and at least reduce their number. (OTOH people  
> might not be inclined do something about it until we thoroughly break  
> it.)

Maplint already complains about branching ways, too, but for some it
seems just too convenient...

> 2. Areas with holes. Don't have a good idea for them yet. Anyone else?

Either areas geth their own data primitives, or you model the holes as
separate paths, but somehow relate them to the other path defining the
area, thus creating a hole in the area.

[...]

> I'm busy implementing relationships at the moment but after that, I'd  
> even fly over to help.

- --

Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGqhL1FUbODdpRVDwRAkr+AJ9jnnNJPAFvKdX70I2wXm9Pp3AgBgCgng2d
lMSvHyGj9FO++gifebSkFe4=
=b8xG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the dev mailing list