[OSM-dev] Effort in the US wasted until TIGER import is complete?

Robert (Jamie) Munro rjmunro at arjam.net
Mon Mar 26 17:24:03 BST 2007

Hash: SHA1

Mikel Maron wrote:
> My recommendation for the next try at importing TIGER has been to make
> it more manual,
> that counties should be imported by individuals interested in mapping in
> the area. All other
> data in OpenStreetMap is built under stewardship, and until we're
> extremely confident in the
> quality of the import, I would suggest Tiger be closely handled as well.

I strongly disagree. We should get all the existing free data in as soon
as possible, then let people edit it and make it better. Anyone who
lives in an area covered by TIGER data should be able to see themselves
on OSM as soon as possible.

Can I suggest an alternative approach to the TIGER import? Can we get
hold of TIGER in standard ShapeFile format, then write a converter for
that? There is a shapefile importer here:

It would need improving, but once that is done, having a shapefile
importer that is good enough to work on the whole TIGER dataset would
mean that it is easily good enough to work on any other shapefile data
set that we might get hold of in the future, from whatever source.

Robert (Jamie) Munro

Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


More information about the dev mailing list