[OSM-dev] OpenSpaceMap

Nick Black nickblack1 at gmail.com
Thu May 10 13:47:52 BST 2007


Looks like they could be OSGB coordinates.

On 5/10/07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>       by accident I stumbled across these nodes
>
> <node id="27475484" lat="127136.0" lon="485452.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:19+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475485" lat="127216.0" lon="485548.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:19+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475486" lat="127200.0" lon="485580.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:19+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475487" lat="127168.0" lon="485532.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:20+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475488" lat="127096.0" lon="485548.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:21+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475489" lat="127072.0" lon="485500.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:22+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475490" lat="127120.0" lon="485468.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:23+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475492" lat="126104.0" lon="482980.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:17:51+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475493" lat="126216.0" lon="483036.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:17:51+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475494" lat="126288.0" lon="483156.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:17:52+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475508" lat="126304.0" lon="483204.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:06+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475510" lat="126248.0" lon="483204.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:07+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475511" lat="126224.0" lon="483132.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:08+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475513" lat="126184.0" lon="483052.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:09+01:00"/>
> <node id="27475514" lat="126120.0" lon="482996.0"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:10+01:00"/>
>
> which obviously have invalid co-ordinates. These nodes are used by
> the following segments
>
> <segment id="23470739" from="27475484" to="27475485"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:27+01:00"/> <segment id="23470740"
> from="27475485" to="27475486" timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:28+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470741" from="27475486" to="27475487"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:29+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470742" from="27475487" to="27475488"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:31+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470743" from="27475488" to="27475489"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:31+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470744" from="27475489" to="27475490"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:32+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470745" from="27475490" to="27475484"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:33+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470748" from="27475492" to="27475493"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:16+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470749" from="27475493" to="27475494"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:17+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470750" from="27475494" to="27475508"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:18+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470751" from="27475508" to="27475510"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:19+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470752" from="27475510" to="27475511"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:20+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470753" from="27475511" to="27475513"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:21+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470754" from="27475513" to="27475514"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:22+01:00"/>
> <segment id="23470755" from="27475514" to="27475492"
> timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:23+01:00"/>
>
> and these segments are referenced by the following ways:
>
> <way id="4482396" visible="true" timestamp="2007-04-19T23:18:26
> +01:00" user="nickw">
>    <seg id="23470748"/>
>    <seg id="23470749"/>
>    <seg id="23470750"/>
>    <seg id="23470751"/>
>    <seg id="23470752"/>
>    <seg id="23470753"/>
>    <seg id="23470754"/>
>    <seg id="23470755"/>
> </way>
>
> <way id="4482387" visible="true" timestamp="2007-04-19T23:16:36
> +01:00" user="nickw">
>    <seg id="23470739"/>
>    <seg id="23470740"/>
>    <seg id="23470741"/>
>    <seg id="23470742"/>
>    <seg id="23470743"/>
>    <seg id="23470744"/>
>    <seg id="23470745"/>
>    <tag k="natural" v="water"/>
> </way>
>
> Very little chance that this has anything to do with sporadic server
> hiccups but instead of just deleting them (which I'd normally do) I
> thought I'd post them for people to think about wheter these might
> cause trouble.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>



-- 
Nick Black
--------------------------------
http://www.blacksworld.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20070510/41d1cf63/attachment.html>


More information about the dev mailing list