[OSM-dev] New MapPaint plugin
shaunmcdonald131 at gmail.com
Thu May 10 23:24:03 BST 2007
On 10 May 2007, at 23:02, Robert Hart wrote:
>> If we do make a move over to sf, then we could move svn over there,
>> therefore releasing a server for the main map viewing facilities.
>> Such as allowing an extra proxy server or layer to be added.
> svn, trac, and wiki are all the same server I think.
> I don't think anybody suggested moving over to sf - they were just
> comparing what we have to what they do. osm does have www hosting,
> it's just that many more people have svn access than dev accounts, or
> www acconts.
OK, my brain is running in overdrive again.
Even if we do use the binary download facilities, it would still be
an advantage to us as we wouldn't need to find a server to host them.
What is the current demand for them? Is it enough to warrant a mirror
More information about the dev