[OSM-dev] TIGER, which states next?

Karl Newman siliconfiend at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 17:35:31 BST 2007

On 10/23/07, Karl Newman <siliconfiend at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/07, Dave Hansen <dave at sr71.net> wrote:
> > I'm basically out of empty states to upload. I've done Oregon,
> > Washington, Montana, North/South Dakota, Alabama and Georgia.  Should I
> > just start uploading over existing data, or are there some large swaths
> > of states out there that I can put in the queue?
> >
> > -- Dave
> The following Northwest California counties are pretty empty right now
> (except for some major roads and coastlines):
> Del Norte
> Humboldt
> Mendocino
> Trinity
> Lake
> There's a bunch of unwayed segments and unwayed nodes in there. I
> might purge those out before you start the upload.
> I'm looking at Northeast CA right now to find more candidates.
Okay, someone has done a fair amount of mapping around Lassen NP, but
I don't think the TIGER data will collide too much. So, I think you
can safely add the following Northeast CA counties, too:

I'll keep looking for more candidates in CA. (I'm using data from the
planet file and looking at the results in JOSM).

More information about the dev mailing list