[OSM-dev] Possible Potlatch Bugs
Brett Henderson
brett at bretth.com
Thu Oct 25 05:51:53 BST 2007
I'm probably not much help with the Potlatch side of things, but I can
run regular referential integrity reports if that is useful ...
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Brett Henderson wrote:
>
>
>> The history is a bit odd. The sequence of events appears to be:
>> * Node is created.
>> * Node is deleted immediately followed by way creation referring to
>> it.
>> * Way and node are both updated but node is still deleted (ie. not
>> visible).
>>
>> Can anybody shed some light on why this is occurring?
>>
>
> I'm continuing to look into this one. It may well be connected with
> the repeatedly mentioned bug whereby a "whichways" call (i.e. get
> POIs) can take place halfway through a "putway" call (i.e. save way)
> - in other words, when the nodes have been written but not the way,
> causing whichways to identify them as POIs. The user then sees these
> misleading POI nodes and tries to delete them. I have tried to squash
> this bug but haven't managed yet.
>
> Anyone else is very welcome to look over the Potlatch source, it
> doesn't just have to be me... :)
>
More information about the dev
mailing list