[OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Trouble in Rangoon
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Feb 28 14:26:26 GMT 2008
Hi,
> What about implicitely creating a new changeset if none is
> given, so that a transition is smooth?
I did suggest that on the Wiki page.
> Can anyone suggest to handle the case of user B
> editing entities that are edited in the changeset
> of A before AND after the edit of B?
Difficult but I hope we can ignore that. Individual objects still
have their version numbers as they have now, so in your scenario:
> A: open changeset
> A: move point X to the left
> B: move point X a bit north
> A: move point X to the a bit more left
> A: close changeset
B's change would have the higher version number but be part of a
changeset with an earlier date than A - slightly quirky but not
really cause for concern.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
More information about the dev
mailing list