[OSM-dev] Area support (was: 0.6 API Status)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Frederik Ramm wrote:

> It seems obvious that areas, like ways, need to be

were

> based on a sequence
> of nodes. [...]
>
> An area with no holes inside would trivially have

had

> the exact same
> structure as a way, perhaps using <area> instead of <way>.

Was it 0.2 or 0.3 that had areas? Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

cheers
Richard