[OSM-dev] 0.6 API clarifications and corrections
tom at compton.nu
Fri May 16 11:13:58 BST 2008
In message <E3231615-BA65-4FA6-A18F-EABC2155D9F4 at systemeD.net>
Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> Dave Stubbs wrote:
>> this whole argument is over the format of a changeset
>> query where it would be quite possible to implement it both ways, and
>> have both available at the same time.
> That's a very good point.
An even better point is that we don't even know if collapsing the
edits is even practical - I imagine it would be quite an expensive
thing for the server to do.
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
More information about the dev