[OSM-dev] Data corruption :) II
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Nov 26 07:51:51 GMT 2008
Hi,
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> My suggestion for your current issue would be to leave it alone until we
>> have API 0.6 in place, because with our current infrastructure you are
>> fighting windmills - every day new inconsistencies are created. With any
>> luck, that will be a thing of the past once we have full transactions
>> with API 0.6; so AFTER that is active we can prepare one big "fix legacy
>> inconsistencies" operation and remove them once and for all.
>
> Not acceptable.
I cannot see the logic behind this. You will not be able to force
consistency onto 0.5; if your software cannot work with inconsistencies
then it cannot work with the dumps/diffs we produce until 0.6. So either
you find a way to handle these things on your side, or you will not be
able to run your software until 0.6 anyway. Even if you do a mass change
now to fix the existing inconsistencies, each day will produce new ones,
and your software will fall over. Unless you find a way to deal with the
inconsistencies, in which case you'd have to tell us why exactly 15k
inconsistencies are "not acceptable" while a few hundred are.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the dev
mailing list