[OSM-dev] Code of conduct for automated (mass-) edits

Stefan de Konink skinkie at xs4all.nl
Mon Sep 29 00:27:16 BST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Frederik Ramm schreef:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-September/029983.html
> 
> When I issued words of caution on the German list, some people came to 
> me grinning and said "well there you have it, that's what happens when 
> you have a project without rules, and anyone making automated changes 
> has the same right to do so as anyone else".

In NL we would call this ultimate anarchy and unless one of our
dictators steps in to stop anyone nothing happens. So if someone doesn't
like automatic edits it should be able to be reverted easily...


...wait... doesn't that sounds much like if someone doesn't like
*normal* edits... mmhhhmmm, yes it does!


Your code of conduct is useless in respect that non automatic edits are
usually undiscussed too. You can put it in one way or the other. Please
fix the data reverting model before introducing more 'rules'. And if you
don't do so... I'll personally instruct my bot to revert all your edits ;)



Stefan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREKAAYFAkjgEtQACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn0VowCdGciG1PmfsHLjzwHA6MdHCUt6
fXIAn289+fm+N2DcyGitJNnUZN/OBfhT
=Ak2x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the dev mailing list