[OSM-dev] Code of conduct for automated (mass-) edits
Stefan de Konink
skinkie at xs4all.nl
Mon Sep 29 15:49:45 BST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Frederik Ramm schreef:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> In NL we would call this ultimate anarchy and unless one of our
>> dictators steps in to stop anyone nothing happens. So if someone doesn't
>> like automatic edits it should be able to be reverted easily...
>
> Sounds to me like asking for trouble, but if the NL folks are happy with
> working that way, then I'll just put up "my" code of conduct on a web
> page and revert any change that doesn't comply. It's not my style really
> but if that is standard operating procedure for NL then I'll adapt ;-)
Really please do so :) (I'm serious!) If there is a way you could check
for automatic behavior and revert if they not comply I consider that a
good thing.
Could you do the same thing for users that make typo's?
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEAREKAAYFAkjg6wkACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3tZgCfUios8tstz+r02HOIPIA7Ut8P
ed0An18FL6B50vAQE1cMy7gVRvXL55W9
=sV3d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dev
mailing list