[OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

Richard Fairhurst richard at systemeD.net
Mon Apr 6 09:41:56 BST 2009

Stefan de Konink wrote:

> Now how is it possible that there was no 415 on that update?

I'm going to pass on this one as I didn't write the Potlatch  
relations code, Dave did - any thoughts?


More information about the dev mailing list