[OSM-dev] Tagwatch Editor Counts
Matt Amos
zerebubuth at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 18:58:14 GMT 2009
for JOSM:
lang | num | num_users
-------+--------+-----------
de | 491078 | 6457
en | 240905 | 3086
| 76081 | 2704
fr | 91720 | 919
en_GB | 55408 | 852
ru | 45467 | 527
it | 34936 | 357
es | 21888 | 248
nl | 10850 | 177
fi | 18956 | 159
sv | 8482 | 149
cs | 12716 | 144
pl | 7006 | 126
ja | 9313 | 66
da | 3892 | 63
sk | 3120 | 42
nb | 1047 | 35
pt | 583 | 23
ro | 994 | 23
bg | 1762 | 13
for potlatch:
lang | num | num_users
-------+--------+-----------
| 800309 | 46679
en | 109151 | 8023
de | 63330 | 4901
fr | 11479 | 981
ru | 10075 | 732
es | 5274 | 549
it | 7374 | 523
nl | 6520 | 347
pl | 1733 | 226
sv | 3447 | 155
pt-BR | 989 | 152
fi | 1410 | 105
no | 1763 | 84
cs | 505 | 82
ja | 1242 | 80
da | 2261 | 77
hu | 382 | 67
ro | 1041 | 59
pt | 163 | 29
tr | 88 | 26
not sure what the null language results are - presumably at some point
the editors weren't putting a language in their changeset comments or
something?
cheers,
matt
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 20:09, Matt Amos <zerebubuth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> as a massive self-plug, here's a more in-depth look at some of the
>> editor data. unfortunately, there isn't enough data to do this for any
>> editor other than the "big three", but hopefully in six months time...
>
> This looks nice. It's certainly a lot better than my ad-hoc statistics
> I posted in september:
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-September/042902.html
>
> One thing that I missed about your stats though is language statistics
> like the ones I posted (but done better with fancy graphs, obviousl
> :).
>
> Since I posted my stats I've added information about the user language
> to Potlatch (previously only JOSM had them), but unfortunately it
> looks like the Merkaartor people have ignored my request of adding it
> to their created_by string.
>
> It would be really cool to see statistics per-editor and per-language
> presented in such a way that one could gauge whether an editor being
> localized had an effect on its update.
>
> I recently found out for example that the Potlatch translation into
> Italian was really incomplete while JOSM was almost 100% translated
> into Italian (and JOSM has like 4000 strings while Potlatch has around
> 300). I contacted some Italian translators about this and Potlatch now
> has a much better Italian translation.
>
> Perhaps some Italians where shunning Potlatch because of this, it
> would be interesting to see stats to confirm or disprove that.
>
More information about the dev
mailing list