[OSM-dev] Tagwatch Editor Counts

Matt Amos zerebubuth at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 18:58:14 GMT 2009


for JOSM:
 lang  |  num   | num_users
-------+--------+-----------
 de    | 491078 |      6457
 en    | 240905 |      3086
       |  76081 |      2704
 fr    |  91720 |       919
 en_GB |  55408 |       852
 ru    |  45467 |       527
 it    |  34936 |       357
 es    |  21888 |       248
 nl    |  10850 |       177
 fi    |  18956 |       159
 sv    |   8482 |       149
 cs    |  12716 |       144
 pl    |   7006 |       126
 ja    |   9313 |        66
 da    |   3892 |        63
 sk    |   3120 |        42
 nb    |   1047 |        35
 pt    |    583 |        23
 ro    |    994 |        23
 bg    |   1762 |        13

for potlatch:
 lang  |  num   | num_users
-------+--------+-----------
       | 800309 |     46679
 en    | 109151 |      8023
 de    |  63330 |      4901
 fr    |  11479 |       981
 ru    |  10075 |       732
 es    |   5274 |       549
 it    |   7374 |       523
 nl    |   6520 |       347
 pl    |   1733 |       226
 sv    |   3447 |       155
 pt-BR |    989 |       152
 fi    |   1410 |       105
 no    |   1763 |        84
 cs    |    505 |        82
 ja    |   1242 |        80
 da    |   2261 |        77
 hu    |    382 |        67
 ro    |   1041 |        59
 pt    |    163 |        29
 tr    |     88 |        26

not sure what the null language results are - presumably at some point
the editors weren't putting a language in their changeset comments or
something?

cheers,

matt

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 20:09, Matt Amos <zerebubuth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> as a massive self-plug, here's a more in-depth look at some of the
>> editor data. unfortunately, there isn't enough data to do this for any
>> editor other than the "big three", but hopefully in six months time...
>
> This looks nice. It's certainly a lot better than my ad-hoc statistics
> I posted in september:
>
>    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-September/042902.html
>
> One thing that I missed about your stats though is language statistics
> like the ones I posted (but done better with fancy graphs, obviousl
> :).
>
> Since I posted my stats I've added information about the user language
> to Potlatch (previously only JOSM had them), but unfortunately it
> looks like the Merkaartor people have ignored my request of adding it
> to their created_by string.
>
> It would be really cool to see statistics per-editor and per-language
> presented in such a way that one could gauge whether an editor being
> localized had an effect on its update.
>
> I recently found out for example that the Potlatch translation into
> Italian was really incomplete while JOSM was almost 100% translated
> into Italian (and JOSM has like 4000 strings while Potlatch has around
> 300). I contacted some Italian translators about this and Potlatch now
> has a much better Italian translation.
>
> Perhaps some Italians where shunning Potlatch because of this, it
> would be interesting to see stats to confirm or disprove that.
>




More information about the dev mailing list