[OSM-dev] OSM Fixer [Sequal]

[Matt Amos]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Stefan de Konink <stefan at konink.de> wrote:
> Andy Allan wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Stefan de Konink <stefan at konink.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> It's a known problem with a fix on the way with 0.6.
>>> Is this already checked that it will be fixed using 0.6? Since currently
>>> the API doesn't seem to be the problem, the lacking referential
>>> constraints inside the database, and resulting database export is.
>>
>> Not sure if you're just being obtuse or you really don't know what
>> we're talking about, but when we say "API 0.6" we mean new version of
>> the XML API + new version of the Rails code + new version of db
>> structure (yes, including foreign keys etc) that all go hand in hand.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/0.6#Related_database_improvements
>
> I cannot get from that page that you are adding these things

yeah, the wiki page could probably do with some updating. but you
remember this thread last month, right?
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-February/014024.html

the issue with things referencing deleted items should go away because
the transactions wrap the used-by checks.

> Never the less, I asked Dave if he checked in the MySQL database if the
> presented violators are in there or if this is a hypercube issue. I
> would like to have a reply to that, because then it might be an issue
> that should be addressed by more people.

looks like it might be a planet generation issue. maybe take a look at
the history for some of the items which are causing you problems?

cheers,

matt