osm at inbox.org
Wed Sep 30 00:58:01 BST 2009
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Peter Körner <osm-lists at mazdermind.de>wrote:
>> > And I believe it has
>> > been suggested to use boundary relations rather than polygons in cases
>> > where there are a lot of overlapping boundaries.
>> Yes, I'ts not good to have overlapping ways - they are a mess to edit
>> and they can be constructed by relations, as well.
> I've been hoping someone would strike up a conversation with me on a good
> algorithm to find and relation-ize overlapping boundary ways. I would love
> to implement this...
Can we assume the shared ways use shared nodes? I was planning on making
that assumption, because I believe it's true for the particular data I'm
trying to import. Without that assumption, it's probably too much work for
the time I have.
In any case, I have to worry about converting the multipolygons from the
shapefile I have first. I'm pretty sure there are some, in the standard
"holes go clockwise" format, and shp2osm doesn't handle that as far as I can
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dev