[OSM-dev] pbf2osm development has started [code to test!]

[Scott Crosby]

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Stefan de Konink <stefan at konink.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Chris Browet wrote:
>
>  Sure. I don't think the C -> C++ will be problematic.
>>>
>>
>>
> I have been thinking about 'hooks' so the defines can become hooks you
> replace (So somesort of ifndef way.) Or just inline functions...


I suggest not using #define's. Just have a struct of function pointer
callbacks. Indirect jumps are as cheap as ordinary function calls as long as
the branch predictor can predict them. In this case, prediction will be
100%.

 If you'd accept some related patches, it would greatly improve
>> re-usability and trackability of pbm2osm...
>>
>
> Obviously I do ;) Just hadn't the time to integrate it yet. And busy day a
> head with flying ;)


This work on the C/C++ parser should be merged with the Java repository.
There should be one canonical place where the *.proto's are located.

Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20101025/dab6eed7/attachment.html>