[OSM-dev] Another benchmark
Oliver Tonnhofer
olt at omniscale.de
Fri Apr 29 16:02:09 BST 2011
On 29.04.2011, at 16:34, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> I'm making so tests and debug, and i'll post the final code tomorrow.
>
> The actual code :
> https://github.com/padorange/osm-xml-tests
Thanks for sharing your code! iterparse is slower in you case, because you're using the Python version of ElementTree and not cElementTree.
You need to change the import:
from xml.etree import cElementTree as ElementTree # fast xml parser module
[/tmp/osm-xml-tests]% python xml_test.py -f /Users/olt/dev/osm_data/hamburg.osm
-------------------------------------------------
ElementTree (iterparse)
unknown element bound
> 524316 nodes parsed, 26 match
> element tree parsing : 10.6 seconds
-------------------------------------------------
xml.sax
Don't know element osm
Don't know element bound
> 524316 nodes parsed, 26 match
> element tree parsing : 15.4 seconds
-------------------------------------------------
[/tmp/osm-xml-tests]% ll /Users/olt/dev/osm_data/hamburg.osm
-rw-r--r-- 1 olt staff 127869154 Jan 19 2010 /Users/olt/dev/osm_data/hamburg.osm
BTW: You can safe a few lines of code if you handle everything in the 'end' clause, see my code example.
Regards,
Oliver
--
Oliver Tonnhofer | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG | http://omniscale.de
http://mapproxy.org | https://bitbucket.org/olt | @oltonn
More information about the dev
mailing list