[OSM-dev] (Multi)Polygon handling

Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org
Fri Jul 13 15:05:27 BST 2012

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 03:24:47PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote:
> > That sounds reasonable. But we need to agree on what is valid and what is
> > treated as invalid. In the testsuite of closed ways that I commited to
> > github I defined an output for every case, but I'm not sure if the inputs
> > are valid. My guess would be:
> > 1) Definitely valid
> OK
> > 2) valid
> Why do you need to reverse the winding order ? I thought that the WKT convention

Winding order should not be changed IMHO. It might mean something in specific
cases, who knowns? It could be an optional feature.

Jochen Topf  jochen at remote.org  http://www.remote.org/jochen/  +49-721-388298

More information about the dev mailing list