[OSM-dev] (Multi)Polygon handling

[Jochen Topf]

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 03:24:47PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote:
> > That sounds reasonable. But we need to agree on what is valid and what is
> > treated as invalid. In the testsuite of closed ways that I commited to
> > github I defined an output for every case, but I'm not sure if the inputs
> > are valid. My guess would be:
> 
> > 1) Definitely valid
> 
> OK
> 
> > 2) valid
> 
> Why do you need to reverse the winding order ? I thought that the WKT convention

Winding order should not be changed IMHO. It might mean something in specific
cases, who knowns? It could be an optional feature.

Jochen
-- 
Jochen Topf  jochen at remote.org  http://www.remote.org/jochen/  +49-721-388298