[OSM-dev] Reserve node 2147483647

SomeoneElse lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk
Fri Jul 20 13:44:59 BST 2012

Andrew wrote:
> Would it be a good idea if the next node allocated after 2147483646 is node
> 2147483648? It would mean that applications expecting 32-bit node numbers fail
> cleanly and stops buggy editing software from modifying the wrong node.

Not that far away now, I guess (I added 1831586714 last night).  I doubt 
that everything expecting 32-bit numbers will fail cleanly though!


More information about the dev mailing list