[OSM-dev] Google Summer of Code
uu.kabum at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 11:14:40 BST 2012
me again. Derick answered my PM and I recognized, that I've missed some
The interface should be a simple website listing the suspicious changesets.
As well a possibility to mark false positives and false negatives were
Derick suggested also a integration with JOSM and mentioned its changeset
Am 26. März 2012 00:36 schrieb kabum <uu.kabum at gmail.com>:
> Am 19. März 2012 22:45 schrieb Graham Jones <grahamjones139 at gmail.com>:
>> Thank you for your interest in applying for GSoC with Openstreetmap.
>> This list will be fine to ask questions.
>> Here are a few suggestions to get you started:
>> - It is important to understand the fundamentals of what OSM is, so if
>> you have not done so before, please start by creating an account and making
>> some improvements to the map in your local area.
> I heard of OSM a long time ago, but was just to lazy to contribute to. So
> I tried these days and I was really surprised how fast changes are visible
> in the rendered map. I've taken several notes of my surrounding waiting for
> filled into the OSM database. :)
>> - It would also be good to look at the OSM data structure. Details of
>> the xml file format can be found on our wiki.
> Done :)
>> - If you search for Nominatim on the OSM wiki you should find some
>> information on the current service and links to the source code to see how
>> it currently does searching to see how it could be improved.
> The project idea was suggested by 'sabas88' - could he/she provide some
>> more information on the issues behind this project suggestion please?
> I've asked him and the only answer was a link to the GSoC project site in
> the OSM wiki. :(
> I read a lot about OSM, it's mechanism, assistant tools, etc and also
> about Nominatim and I realized, that this isn't what I want to do. I've
> looking for some other contribution to OSM and GSoC and found the
> suggestion for an quality assurance tool specialized for edits/changesets
> (by Derick Rethans). There are many quality assurance tools but no one like
> this - or have I missed it?
> The idea is to have a engine that gets a (set of) changesets or edits and
> analyse them. It should detect things like logical mistakes, mass deletions
> without corresponding insertions, etc and take also user metadata like
> duration of membership or count of his edits into account. It would be
> great if it compare the changes with current state of the data in this area
> and detect senseless checks, because the data is out of date and already
> Some other things to keep in mind while planning:
> - extensibility through "plugins": engine (calls)-> several detection
> - there could be searches for suspicious changesets/edits in specific area
> This was just a quick outline of the proposal. Are there some suggestions,
> wishes, questions or doubts?
> In the next days I plan to specify this proposal.
> Best regards,
> Morris Jobke
>> Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask more questions as you develop
>> your proposal.
>> On 19 March 2012 21:28, kabum <uu.kabum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am interested in "Nominatim (or alternative)", but there isn't any
>>> mentor mentioned. Where could I discuss about the idea?
>>> Best regards,
>>> Morris Jobke
>>> dev mailing list
>>> dev at openstreetmap.org
>> Graham Jones
>> Hartlepool, UK.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dev