[OSM-dev] WHODIDIT

[Pierre Béland]

Yes, to do efficient monitoring of an area, It is of interest to show edits other then nodes. But I understand the technical challenge.

There were nodes edited in the area but they are not reported. The last ones are in december 2011.

for example :
node id='1452468075' timestamp='2011-12-03T19:15:34Z'
node id='550058835' timestamp='2011-10-03T20:39:08Z'

 
Pierre 



>________________________________
> De : Simon Legner <simon.legner at gmail.com>
>À : "dev at openstreetmap.org" <dev at openstreetmap.org> 
>Cc : Pierre Béland <infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr> 
>Envoyé le : Mardi 13 novembre 2012 8h53
>Objet : Re: [OSM-dev] WHODIDIT
> 
>Hi Pierre,
>
>On 13/11/12 14:38, Pierre Béland wrote:
>> A second problem. There are areas whitout any report were I know that
>> there are some edits up to recently.
>> 
>> See for example
>> http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=14&lat=45.647&lon=-72.56572&layers=BTTT&age=6%20month
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43563217
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/132015616
>
>In the current implementation, coordinates to colour the tiles are taken from the minutely/hourly diffs. Coordinates are only listed for modified nodes. This means that any change without changing nodes isn't shown in whodidit.
>
>It might be worth considering to use augmented diffs
>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Augmented_Diffs
>However, it is not immediately clear which tiles to colour when changing the tags of a very long way and/or modifying a relation …
>
>Cheers,
>Simon
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20121113/a5486cc7/attachment-0001.html>