[OSM-dev] multipolygon relation and non-closed ways

Pedro Larroy pedro.larroy.lists at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 21:39:23 BST 2012


The point I wanted to make is that when encoding riverbanks with a
multipolygon relation in which the ways are parts of the riverbank
such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/75367154  contradicts
the definition of multipolygon relation
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon  which says
that member ways are closed.

I see that these ways have to be stitched toghether to form a propper
closed polygon.

Perhaps a new relation type would be better?

Pedro.

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Cartinus <cartinus at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> That page is the definition of a multypolygon relation. If you are
> asking if that page is contradicting itself, then you have to provide
> more details about where on the page it is doing so in your opinion.
>
> On 10/07/2012 10:12 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
>> You are right, but doesn't this way to encode riverbanks contradict
>> the definition of multipolygon relation?
>>
>>
>> Pedro.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Cartinus <cartinus at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2012 09:59 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
>>>> I'm processing multipolygon relations and finding a lot of unclosed
>>>> ways while processing spain.  The wiki says ways in multipolygon
>>>> relations are closed.
>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
>>>
>>> That page doesn't say the ways have to be closed. Look at figures 3, 5
>>> and 6.
>
>
> --
> ---
> m.v.g.,
> Cartinus
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev



More information about the dev mailing list