[OSM-dev] Add an iD link to the Potlatch no-Flash screen

[Tom MacWright]

Hi Peter,

Please read the previous posts and the linked tickets. Here's the one for
you: https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1181


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Peter Wendorff
<wendorff at uni-paderborn.de>wrote:

> Hi.
>
> As far as I see it's entirely possible to add free tags (there's an
> expand link/button that shows other tags).
> But IMHO it's not enough, because that only shows tags that are not
> included elsewhere in the presetted tag stuff.
> The problem with this is, that for the presetted stuff it's (or at least
> seems to be) impossible to get the raw tags out of it, preventing to
> learn them (yes, novice mappers should not have to, but IMHO they should
> be able to understand the raw tags).
>
> So this tag list should IMHO show all tags, not only those not exposed
> already by even more human readable UI translations.
>
> regards
> Peter
>
>
> Am 22.04.2013 16:50, schrieb Tom MacWright:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> >> it seems as if doesn't expose way membership to the user currently. In
> > any area with multipolygons or turn restrictions or, likely more
> difficult
> > to fix, other types or relations, mappers will really break a lot without
> > even being able to notice.
> >
> > It doesn't expose relations in the UI, but does not break them and makes
> > the same relatively smart choices as P2 when users make operations on
> ways
> > and nodes in relations.
> >
> > "break a lot" is unfounded and untrue: users have been testing iD for
> weeks
> > now and we are not seeing significant problems from this approach.
> >
> >> +1 in case of feature X, but freeform tagging is one of the key features
> > that really make osm what it is
> >
> > What's the assertion here, that iD doesn't support freeform tagging?
> That's
> > entirely incorrect: read the issues and look at the user interface. iD
> > supports freeform tagging: just click 'other' and use the tags UI if you
> > don't want to use presets.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
> > dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22/apr/2013, at 16:25, Tom MacWright <tom at macwright.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> For super-advanced editing, there will always be JOSM.
> >>>
> >>> iD does handle relations, though it does not support a relations
> editing
> >> UI at the moment: search for 'relations' in the issue tracker and the
> >> commits. There has been a ton of work on the existing relations support,
> >> how it interacts with pre-existing relations, and plans for simpler
> >> interfaces for editing relations.
> >>
> >>
> >> it seems as if doesn't expose way membership to the user currently. In
> any
> >> area with multipolygons or turn restrictions or, likely more difficult
> to
> >> fix, other types or relations, mappers will really break a lot without
> even
> >> being able to notice.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Yes: iD has room to grow. But I don't think that the 'a front page
> >> editor must include X feature that I think is important' is a useful
> >> criteria. If you ask whether an editor has been tested, used, deployed,
> and
> >> generally regarded as safe, iD fits that goal.
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 in case of feature X, but freeform tagging is one of the key features
> >> that really make osm what it is
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20130422/f219ca44/attachment.html>