[OSM-dev] Default map style on osm.org
Peter K
peathal at yahoo.de
Wed Aug 28 15:05:34 UTC 2013
Hi Andy, hi Frederik, hi Maarten,
>> I know that this is highly subjective: But why has the default map
>> style to be that ugly? I don't mean it as a rant, I know how difficult
>> it is to create something like this. I only say that it is 'ugly'
>> because I know there are a lot better and several alternatives.
>>
>> What do I mean with 'ugly'? I mean, besides the ugly bing-magenta for
>> country lines and some texts the style is very confusing - too many
>> unimportant information are packed on especially the higher zoom
>> levels (smaller than 12). Or the contrast to see main roads is just
>> too low. Not sure.
>
> As you say: it's highly subjective.
> I have no problem with the default OSM style at all. The only thing is
> that from zooms 8 and lower I think the landuse may be less prominent.
> Some time ago someone showed a new lowzoom renderer that looked rather
> nice.
> I also don't see a big difference between the .de and the default map.
> The two differences are that .de has red-yellow motorways (in the
> style of a lot of paper maps) and that the general theme is less red
> and more green.
Yes, .de and default are not that different. But I think .de is one step
into a good direction with somehow more contrast colours. And yes, the
landuse is also one thing which is confusing to me (and others).
> If you follow these lists for a while (and possibly the enhancement
requests filed in trac or github for the map style)
> then you will see that we have many many people keen on adding more
and more detail to the map.
Exactly that is what is the problem: too detailed on overview zoom
levels. But it is good to hear that there will be progress on the style
- not only on the internals (which is of course really great - see below).
> We're trying to keep the default map usable but at the same time it is
also used by mappers to get feedback on their edits;
Ok, that is an argument. But I expect mappers to be able to switch the
layer in their settings in comparison to an average 'luser'.
> See the following video for some background regarding the current
state of the main map style
http://vimeopro.com/openstreetmapus/state-of-the-map-us-2013/video/68093876
> Since the conference, the new openstreetmap-carto stylesheets are now
live, and many small improvements are starting to show up.
I know. This is a really nice direction and lots of possibilities are
opened via this. But I've always heard/read that the style has to stay
the same. Could it be an option with Carto-CSS (in the future) that the
default style is less detailed and mappers can enable this if they want?
Who can decide and develop this in the future?
Regards,
Peter.
More information about the dev
mailing list