[OSM-dev] osmium check-refs failing on latest assembled PBF with hourly changes

Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org
Wed Dec 2 10:38:39 UTC 2020


Hi!

There is a problem with the hourly diffs. From my analysis it looks like
minutely diff 4304922 is in hourly diff 72012 and minutely diff 430925
is in hourly 72013, but the two minutely diffs in between (4304923 and
4304924) are in neither. So you are definitely missing some data and
osmium check-refs found part of that.

Sysadmins are aware of the problem and maybe we going to get a fixed
hourly file. If not you should be able to fix this by applying those two
minutely diffs and then re-applying all the hourly diffs from that
point.

Jochen

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:53:49AM -0500, Manohar Erikipati via dev wrote:
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:53:49 -0500
> From: Manohar Erikipati via dev <dev at openstreetmap.org>
> To: dev at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-dev] osmium check-refs failing on latest assembled PBF with
>  hourly changes
> 
> Hi, we have been applying new hourly changesets to create a daily PBF. This
> works very well and it is continuously stable. Recently, when the hourly
> changes were applied, I noticed a failure in osmium check-refs.
> 
> Hourly file changes applied are from these files
> 
> from hour/000/071/849.osc.gz to hour/000/072/051.osc.gz
> 
> Updating sequence number from 71849 to 72051
> 
> Running a osmium check-refs * on the updated PBF results in several
> referential check failures for nodes. Nodes that belong to below OSM ways.
> When I looked into these OSM ways through JOSM, I could not spot any
> problems.
> 
> Ways
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185306812
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36960460
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326450137
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872325295
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878901824
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878968187
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878968195
> 
> Example nodes
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176907685
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176907689
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176907690
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176907686
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176968661
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176907653
> 
> Could someone help if they have observed any missing data in the hourly
> files or if osmium check-refs itself is not highlighting any problematic
> relation.
> 
> Any help is appreciated, thanks.
> 
> Manohar
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manoharuss

> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev


-- 
Jochen Topf  jochen at remote.org  https://www.jochentopf.com/  +49-351-31778688



More information about the dev mailing list