<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><br>> I have never found any use for the big changeset indication that was there before, other than to make me depressed when I click on history for a random area and find, invariably, that 19 of the 20 edits listed are shown as big.<br><br>It's useful to quick find the one that isn't big! <br><br>> I have no objection to distinguishing friend edits, or bot edits (if we had a way to know which they were, which we don't).<br><br>Cool. bot=yes tag on the changeset is a good first step.<br><br>> I don't see the point of distinguishing "big" edits because people don't really care - the only thing they really case about is whether the edit
touches a given area. Big is simply a (poor) proxy for that.<br><br>I disagree strongly. I think people really do care, enough that any proxy is good for the moment ... what percentage of big edits cover any particular area?<br><br>-Mikel<br></div></div>
</div></body></html>