[diversity-talk] [Tagging] Childcare Tag

[alyssa wright]

OK. This "just f*cking do it" mantra was more fun than I expected. I'm like
giddy.

Pull request to add childcare to iD.

https://github.com/systemed/iD/pull/1630

Now who's the contact for JOSM?

Alyssa.





On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, alyssa wright <alyssapwright at gmail.com>wrote:

> more discussion about the childcare tag in case anyone wants to jump in. i
> have no idea what the guy is talking about. (ok, a slight idea)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: alyssa wright <alyssapwright at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Childcare Tag
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't really follow. So some questions inline:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
>> Hey Alyssa
>>
>> > I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
>> > happened with this childcare tag proposal?
>> >
>> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
>> >
>>
>> I really do not see any major changes to the rejected version 1 in 2011:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare
>>
>> My main concern is that deprecating amenity=kindergarden will not
>> work/be accepted and that it is not flexible enough, e.g. you can not
>> use it with other amenities.
>>
>
> Even if there aren't major changes to the proposals perhaps the needs of
> OSM have shifted since 2011. So not sure I follow on why a previous
> rejection dictates a current one.
>
> Which tag isn't flexible enough (not sure what "It" refers to in your
> sentence). It seems like it takes into account the kindergarden scope as
> well as other childcare spaces, such as nursery, orphanage. It allows for
> more specificity than the existing kindergarden tab as well as cultural
> differences. Is it typical for amenity tags to be used with other
> amenities? Is there something in this proposal that stops such
> combinations? I've reviewed amenity=library and amenity=restaurant and
> don't see the difference in approach. But again, I'm new to this so it
> might be more subtle than I realize.
>
>
>> Best would be to find a better key or prekey to get it working.
>>
>
> Again, what is "It" referring to here?  And can you give some suggestions
> on how to make the proposal better?
>
>>
>> If you want to read the discussions please have a look at the archive:
>>
>> version 1: spring 2011
>> version 2: may and june 2013
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alyssa.
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> fly
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/diversity-talk/attachments/20130709/1ffd065c/attachment.html>