[Geocoding] [OpenStreetMap] #4698: When addr:place is given, the object should not be automatically associated to a street
OpenStreetMap
trac at noreply.openstreetmap.org
Sat Nov 24 14:45:24 GMT 2012
#4698: When addr:place is given, the object should not be automatically associated
to a street
-----------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: ajank | Owner: geocoding@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: nominatim | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------+-------------------------
In many countries, small villages do not have street names, and the
addresses are formed by combining the village name itself with a house
number. According to OSM wiki, the "part of address, which is not related
to street, but to some territorial zone, linear object, node or some
abstract object" should be put under addr:place tag.
An example house, bearing the postal address "Pomocnia 4, 06-121
Pomocnia", is tagged as follows: addr:housenumber = 4 + addr:place =
Pomocnia + addr:city = Pomocnia + addr:postcode = 06-121:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details?osmtype=W&osmid=185887900.
Apparently Nominatim desperately tried to associate the object with any
named street. In this case, the nearest one occurred to be a tertiary road
in the neighbouring village, Piskornia Duża. Unfortunately there is no way
of explicitly saying that there is no street name in the address (like
addr:street = NULL).
In my opinion, if an object has the addr:place tag, Nominatim should
refrain from automatically associating it to a nearest named street, and
handle the value of addr:place like an abstract street name. Such a small
change in the algorithm would be a huge improvement to address handling in
rural areas worldwide.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4698>
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/>
OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world
More information about the Geocoding
mailing list