[GraphHopper] Driving Time Graphhopper vs OSRM
Peter K
peathal at yahoo.de
Thu Jul 4 16:11:25 UTC 2013
Hi Laura,
indeed, my integration tests failed too (but the reporting was
improperly scripted ;))
The real problem was that there are indeed very unrealistic maxspeed
values or some German Spaßvögel :)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/204067725
* /maxspeed
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed?uselang=de>//= 300/
Fixed now.
Regards,
Peter.
> HI Laura,
>
> thanks! I'll investigate. Try 'git checkout <somewhereBefore>' for now ;)
>
> Regards,
> Peter.
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I try to import the latest germany file, I now get the following
>> error:
>>
>> 2013-07-04 15:05:44,267 [main] INFO graphhopper.reader.OSMReader - 138?326?809, now parsing ways
>> 04.07.2013 15:05:46 com.google.inject.internal.MessageProcessor visit
>> INFO: An exception was caught and reported. Message: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Speed value too large for encoding: 1890
>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Couldn't load graph
>> at com.graphhopper.http.DefaultModule.configure(DefaultModule.java:62)
>> at com.google.inject.AbstractModule.configure(AbstractModule.java:59)
>> at com.google.inject.spi.Elements$RecordingBinder.install(Elements.java:223)
>> at com.google.inject.spi.Elements.getElements(Elements.java:101)
>> at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorShell$Builder.build(InjectorShell.java:133)
>>
>> Might this relate to the speed limit change performed yesterday?
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Laura
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/3 Peter K <peathal at yahoo.de <mailto:peathal at yahoo.de>>
>>
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> did you pull, recreate graphhopper and import the graph again?
>> For the example graphhopper now returns 1h 6min
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter.
>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your assistance. Unfortunately, it does not
>>> change the driving duration ...
>>>
>>> BR
>>>
>>> Guillaume
>>>
>>> Le 3 juil. 2013 à 16:34, Peter K <peathal at yahoo.de
>>> <mailto:peathal at yahoo.de>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> fixed a bug where speed limits can now be bigger than the speed
>>>> estimated by the highway tag.
>>>> Please report if this fixes your problems!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Peter.
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is an example where time difference is around +40% . The
>>>>> good duration is 1h05 min
>>>>>
>>>>> http://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=47.87502,-3.92245&point=48.44791,-4.41854&vehicle=car
>>>>>
>>>>> Graphhopper : 1h23 min
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://map.project-osrm.org/?hl=fr&loc=47.87502,-3.92245&loc=48.44791,-4.41854
>>>>> OSRM : 01h04 min
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help
>>>>>
>>>>> Guillaume
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 2 juil. 2013 à 14:37, Peter K <peathal at yahoo.de
>>>>> <mailto:peathal at yahoo.de>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not know internals from OSRM but GraphHopper could
>>>>>> probably need
>>>>>> some tuning there (e.g. less speed in cities, less speed for
>>>>>> turns, ...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have some example links for OSRM where you encounter
>>>>>> big differences?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are testing Graphhopper and OSRM and we have found some
>>>>>>> differences in routing times :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Graphhopper returns longer driving time as OSRM does
>>>>>>> (except for very short distance between 2 cities). It
>>>>>>> appears that OSRM driving durations are closer to the real
>>>>>>> durations compare to Graphhopper.
>>>>>>> - We have set same speed parameters (when there is no max
>>>>>>> speed) on Graphhopper (carflagencoder.java) and OSRM (car
>>>>>>> profile).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both Graphhopper and OSRM seems to be using CH.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How to explain these difference in driving time ? Is there a
>>>>>>> way to modify parameters on Graphhopper to get driving
>>>>>>> durations closer to the real ones ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guillaume
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20130704/ee2c6646/attachment.html>
More information about the GraphHopper
mailing list