[OHM] tagging unit movements

Rob Warren warren at muninn-project.org
Mon Apr 15 13:27:12 UTC 2013


Richard,

The way I see it, we have two solutions:

a) Abuse the GPS trace storage of the base OSM database to store the  
movements and modify the  renderers to read them.
b) Implement movement through the use of multiple ways / relations,  
one for each time stamped movement.

I'm tempted to use b) for troops movements and b) for "born digital"  
material like AIS / GPS / radar tracks.

Are you planning to encode units as 'fronts' or as point data with  
nato-style unit icons?

rhw

On 15-Apr-13, at 9:00 AM, historic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:33:30 -0400
> From: Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OHM] tagging unit movements
> Message-ID: <516B4ADA.30101 at averillpark.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> one of my main interests in historic mapping is plotting out the  
> movement of
> units in military campaigns and battles, and the first effort i plan  
> to
> make in
> openhistoricalmap will be based on the 1908 Cope Maps of the Battle of
> Antietam.
>
> has anyone given any thought into how represent something like this?
>
> the Cope maps are at roughly half hour to 1 hour intervals over
> the course of September 17th, 1862 and are in the public domain,
> as they are US Government publications from 1908. they unit
> locations, historic buildings and the road network in the area around
> Sharpsburg, Maryland and crops and fields of the period as well.
>
> richard
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
>
> End of Historic Digest, Vol 9, Issue 8
> **************************************




More information about the Historic mailing list