[Historic] Dating features (was: Introduction & questions)
Rob Warren
warren at muninn-project.org
Wed Feb 27 12:39:04 UTC 2013
Richard,
nice to talk to you again, we previously met at the OSM Hack weekend
in Toronto last year.
There have been some previous discussions on the mailing list about
this topic that should probably be added to the wiki. I also have an
interest in modelling troop movement, through how to do this would
breaking the rails databases is problematic. ...there is also the
question of whether we wish to link to 'current' features within OSM
proper.
I'm currently fighting with renderd - I'd like to be able to add date
ranges to tile requests so that only items within that time range are
rendered on the map. I'm trying to decide between a scheme where the
date range is encoded directly into the URL or within a parameter of
the URL request. Any preferences?
best,
rhw
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:11:21 -0500
> From: Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Historic] introduction & questions
> Message-ID: <512D08D8.6010707 at averillpark.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> i just joined; Jeff Meyers pointed me at the list after a brief
> exchange
> on talk-us
>
> apparently some history oriented OSM projects i'm interested in doing
> match up pretty
> closely with the goals of this project, and the strategy here looks
> very
> much like what i
> thought would be necessary.
>
> i'm (among other things) interested in entering time stamped troop
> movements from
> American Civil War battles and campaigns, with the ultimate goal of
> producing
> customizable animations showing the progress of events.
>
> having said that, has there been any previous discussion about
> tagging?
> in particular,
> things like having a standard tag prefix so that we have a somewhat
> independent
> namespace, e.g. historic:foo or ohm:foo?
>
> has there been any previous discussion about tagging historical events
> and places in
> general?
>
> thanks,
> richard
More information about the Historic
mailing list