[Historic] Dating features (was: Introduction & questions)

Jeff Meyer jeff at gwhat.org
Wed Feb 27 19:07:30 UTC 2013


So, let's test two cases:

* Time Pixels:

base-uri/YYYY/zoom/x/y.img

Should this return start, middle, or end of YYYY, or should we enforce
YYYY-MM-DD at a minimum?

* Web Mercator of Time:

If the year is -2000 BCE, how should we express that?

I'm fine with any answer, but we should pick one and use it until it
breaks. Sound ok? I'm not smart enough to suggest the answer...

- Jeff



On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Rob Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>wrote:

>
> Mikel,
>
>
> On 27-Feb-13, at 1:52 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
>  for a date range:
>> base-uri/date_start/date_end/**zoom/x/y.img
>>
>
> Makes sense.
>
>  for a moment:
>> base-uri/date/zoom/x/y.img
>>
>
> By 'moment', I take it you mean day? Or are you thinking of "Historic"
> values?
>
> As long as this works on a relation, I'd be happy with it.
>
> best,
> rhw
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/historic<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic>
>



-- 
Jeff Meyer
Global World History Atlas
www.gwhat.org
jeff at gwhat.org
206-676-2347
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer> osm: Historical
OSM<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historical_OSM>
 / my OSM user page <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer>
 t: @GWHAThistory <https://twitter.com/GWHAThistory>
 f: GWHAThistory <https://www.facebook.com/GWHAThistory>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20130227/0b632e38/attachment.html>


More information about the Historic mailing list