[OHM] temporal data in the OHM sandbox
Richard Welty
rwelty at averillpark.net
Thu May 16 15:02:08 UTC 2013
On 5/16/13 10:41 AM, Robert Warren wrote:
> Erik,
>
> I've been using the start and end dates as well. I would prefer we use something like life_cycle [1] for structure status since this will better track what structure is in what state. Today's ruins are yesterday's town hall.
>
> Rendering is something we still need to work on. Suggest more tagging data is better than less tagging data - it's easier to delete superfluous data later rather than re-creating it.
>
dates and times are problematic in OSM right now; the date/time format for
access conditions is a mess. i suggest we should adapt something
standard like
ISO format or a subset thereof. historically, time zones are fairly
modern so we
need to think about that issue.
some of the military mapping i want to do will require hours and (rough)
minutes.
richard
More information about the Historic
mailing list