[OHM] Historic Digest, Vol 10, Issue 10

[Jeff Meyer]

Can you filter by time?

How about a small set to test? Maybe several blocks around the heart of 5
Points, 1865?

Or the area around the Polo Grounds around 1895?

- Jeff
On May 22, 2013 7:30 AM, "Matt Knutzen" <mattknutzen at nypl.org> wrote:

> NYPL has a set of at least 147,000 historical building footprints of NYC
> if we need a tested.
>
> On May 22, 2013, at 8:00 AM, historic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
>
> > Send Historic mailing list submissions to
> >    historic at openstreetmap.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >    historic-request at openstreetmap.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >    historic-owner at openstreetmap.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Historic digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Re: temporal data in the OHM sandbox (Mikel Maron)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com>
> > To: Robert Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>,
> >    "historic at openstreetmap.org" <historic at openstreetmap.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OHM] temporal data in the OHM sandbox
> > Message-ID:
> >    <1369222983.55843.YahooMailNeo at web161706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> >> ?Don't you think that time name-spacing is going to create a parsing
> nightmare over time? I would expect name collisions in a very short
> timespan. -rhw
> >
> > Yes, it would get messy. But hey, we have a sandbox right now, so can
> try whatever we want ;).
> > ?
> > * Mikel Maron *?+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> >
> >
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Robert Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>
> >> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:25 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [OHM] temporal data in the OHM sandbox
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Don't you think that time name-spacing is going to create a parsing
> nightmare over time? I would expect name collisions in a very short
> timespan. -rhw
> >>
> >>> From: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Without thinking about it much, there's a few options
> >>>
> >>> * associate 1 or mode nodes centered on the building via a relation.
> tag each node with use and time span.
> >>> * time namespacing, ala language localization?
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Related_concepts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * Mikel Maron *?+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Historic mailing list
> >> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20130522/dd7cd080/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Historic mailing list
> > Historic at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
> >
> >
> > End of Historic Digest, Vol 10, Issue 10
> > ****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20130522/eadeeb78/attachment-0001.html>