[OHM] : OHM Hangout

[Jaime Schatz]

Have we agreed on a time for the Hangout?

:) Jaime (intern)
On May 15, 2014 5:02 AM, <historic-request at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Send Historic mailing list submissions to
>         historic at openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         historic-request at openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         historic-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Historic digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1.  TimeSlider - calling attention to early prototype (Rob H Warren)
>    2. OHM Hangout (Rob H Warren)
>    3. Re: OHM Hangout (Richard Welty)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:19:51 -0300
> From: Rob H Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>
> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OHM]  TimeSlider - calling attention to early prototype
> Message-ID: <E1B5BD07-1BB0-4947-9C8C-004E29012AF1 at muninn-project.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Figuring all of this is something that will take place in a few
> iterations. Things to keep in mind: The Gregorian calendar starts around
> 1582 and anything before is only really valid as a year.
>
> The interface between the slider and rendering was originally meant to be
> an add-on to the tile renderer with something like startDate, endDate being
> part of the tile URL.
>
> Tim, nice work with the extra layers. What do you think of using TIME-OWL
> style named time periods to deal with things like "Roman Era" for
> "historic" tags? This avoids splitting hairs when rendering with dates and
> help people tag things properly. We can borrow some previous time data from
> [1].
>
> rhw
>
> [1] hypermedia.research.southwales.ac.uk/kos/star/time-periods/
>
>
>
> On May 14, 2014, at 8:50 AM, historic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
>
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:49:51 +0300
> > From: Susanna ?n?s <susanna.anas at gmail.com>
> > To: David Cuenca <dacuetu at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Historic at openstreetmap.org" <historic at openstreetmap.org>, Jaime
> >       Schatz <jaimelynschatz at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [OHM] TimeSlider - calling attention to early prototype
> > Message-ID:
> >       <
> CABQ1c1wmh8r3OwswjAyAaCWoLkwWJ9M8kRKTB4GunqFpWA5irQ at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I agree with Jan that selecting a time range for the map is not as good
> as
> > a point in time, and also with Micru that it is required for events.
> >
> > In fact, we may be talking about 2 different selectors with additional
> > filtering and other options for each.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Susanna
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-14 9:24 GMT+03:00 David Cuenca <dacuetu at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Jan: for the map itself a single slider is definitely the
> >> easiest/clearest. For displaying events on it, a single slider is too
> >> limited, though you could get the same functionality with range queries.
> >> ("look for events that happened between 1500 and 1600, display them on a
> >> 1555 map")
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Micru
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:45:24 -0300
> From: Rob H Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>
> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OHM] OHM Hangout
> Message-ID: <49A5001D-AF1B-4FD0-8254-2728646EE895 at muninn-project.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> We have not had a OHM hangout for a bit, there is one tentatively
> scheduled for thursday next week. If you wish to participate, please fill
> out a fast survey to pick out a good time in UTC-space.
>
> http://doodle.com/7ekaz98w838qws86
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:35:35 -0400
> From: Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
> To: historic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OHM] OHM Hangout
> Message-ID: <53737F37.4070406 at averillpark.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On 5/14/14 8:45 AM, Rob H Warren wrote:
> > We have not had a OHM hangout for a bit, there is one tentatively
> scheduled for thursday next week. If you wish to participate, please fill
> out a fast survey to pick out a good time in UTC-space.
> >
> > http://doodle.com/7ekaz98w838qws86
> >
> >
> doodle claims the time zone for the poll is Atlantic if that matters.
>
> richard
>
> --
> rwelty at averillpark.net
>  Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
>  OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
>  Java - Web Applications - Search
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 946 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20140514/8ce8a273/attachment-0001.pgp
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
>
> End of Historic Digest, Vol 22, Issue 14
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20140518/281622e7/attachment.html>