[OHM] Linked Data

[Rob H Warren]

Jerry,

I'm thinking that we should adopt OGC-style separation of feature and geometry, but that would break a lot of the OSM tools that people have come to love. If we are going to do that, we should get enough grant money to pay a few devs to fix tools as we break them. -rhw

> On Mar 27, 2015, at 4:12 PM, historic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:33:30 +0000
> From: SK53 <sk53.osm at gmail.com>
> To: Albin Larsson <albin.post at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Historic at openstreetmap.org" <historic at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [OHM] Linked Data
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAELijW-Nxxw4r0AxGBd=s4vL6prHtYHqdCAXxnONY2LLbLPhPQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Very interesting indeed, and I think your ideas really highlight aspects of
> the likely depth of tagging we are likely to end up with in a richly
> developed area of OHM.
> 
> It also convinces me that there is mileage in my idea of splitting out
> metatags from tags describing the object itself.
> 
> Jerry
> 
> On 27 March 2015 at 12:57, Albin Larsson <albin.post at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> My thoughts on linked data in OpenHistoricalMap and how I do it:
>> 
>> 
>> http://abbe98.github.io/blog/2015/03/26/mapping-the-past-with-linked-data-in-openhistoricalmap/
>> 
>> Feedback, ideas, thoughts?
>> 
>> //
>> Albin
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Historic mailing list
>> Historic at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>> 
>> 
> -------------- next p