[OHM] Railroad discussion on talk-us

[Lester Caine]

On 03/04/15 14:01, Richard Welty wrote:
> but i had been thinking about starting a new thread separate from the
> railroad discussion bringing up the issue of perceptions of projects like
> OHM.

While the idea of maintaining objects on the main OSM database which
have a physical trace fits in with 'mapping what is on the ground', we
*DO* need a much more user friendly way of merging secondary data of
what ever source with a current overlay. But I do seem to be banging my
head against a brick wall over data that is currently live in OSM, but
which may become obsolete due to later developments. There is a need for
legacy data to be mapped in parallel with the current on the ground
situation but there is no consensus on how the two should be managed in
parallel?

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk