[OHM] Linked Data

Albin Larsson albin.post at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 15:58:23 UTC 2015


Sorry for the delay answering, I have been busy with other stuff...

About the OGC idea I can't say more then that it would be devastating to
break the existing tools, the existing OHM instances(the rails-fork) is
hard enough to maintain.

Rob could you explain future why owl:sameAs is needed and provide a use
case? I'm not getting the idea...

//
Albin

2015-04-02 15:55 GMT+02:00 Rob H Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>:

> Albin,
>
> I'd add owl:sameAs integration to the list of tags so that we can use OHM
> as a resource discovery mechanism. -rhw
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2015, at 4:12 PM, historic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> >
> > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:57:36 +0100
> > From: Albin Larsson <albin.post at gmail.com>
> > To: "Historic at openstreetmap.org" <historic at openstreetmap.org>
> > Subject: [OHM] Linked Data
> > Message-ID:
> >       <CAM-QGEmn+WwHCK4eee24Nn=+rPvxjFdSLqJ5=fqS33m=
> Dw1osQ at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > My thoughts on linked data in OpenHistoricalMap and how I do it:
> >
> >
> http://abbe98.github.io/blog/2015/03/26/mapping-the-past-with-linked-data-in-openhistoricalmap/
> >
> > Feedback, ideas, thoughts?
> >
> > //
> > Albin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20150406/ee9e7b58/attachment.html>


More information about the Historic mailing list