[OHM] OHM instance of iD 1.7

[Albin Larsson]

Tomorrow I have a chemistry test, but during the weekend I have a in coming
pull request fixing iD#3, iD#1 (a imagery bug) is currently the major block
before compiling it for the site, it could be a issue with core iD and
custom imagery(will look into it as soon as possible).

The commits made earlier for 1.3.9 is outdated as this new fork
takes advantage of new customizing features in iD(
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/customizing-id).  But all former changes apply
to this version too... I have documented all changes I have made and will
include that in my next pull request...

On the help section part, it's much text that is needed and I have seen
people before asking for a "Getting Started" that is what this help section
should be so it would be nice to have it as soon as possible.

Could possible get this compiled and done late next week.

iD#3: https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/iD/issues/3
iD#2: https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/iD/issues/2

//
Albin

2015-02-26 12:22 GMT+01:00 Tim Waters <chippy2005 at gmail.com>:

> I've been chatting with Albin off-list about this, glad to see more
> interest!
>
> One thing I should have said was that previously, iD was configured via
> changing the compiled iD.js file - more of a hack, rather than compiling
> the iD code.
> So my memory is shaky, but there were some text string alterations and a
> few bits of code changes in that compiled iD.js file and I think in the
> vendor/assets for iD.
>
> A couple of commits for starters - there are more there in the log
>
> https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/ohm-website/commit/7c4d42c0bc5a5233f7c1c0c6550557b2418f686e
>
> https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/ohm-website/commit/82d4c4ea18803079dbe4c4c232f9bb31c6c946da
>
> We'd need to ensure that these changes are just looked at before we can
> compile and add the new version of iD. No merges or anything, but knowing
> they are there may assist in the task.
>
> cheers,
>
> Tim
>
> On 26 February 2015 at 09:41, Jo Walsh <metazool at fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 09:01 PM, albin.post at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Note that the Github repo now is located in the OHM organization.
>>
>> To answer the question, when someone has written the help sections and I
>> got the time...
>>
>>
>> I've taken the liberty of raising a github issue for the help text:
>> https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/ohm-website/issues/20
>>
>> I wouldn't know where to start with the documentation of MapWarper etc,
>> but I would advise not to hold back on releasing new work because custom
>> documentation isn't complete - having an updated iD in place should spur
>> people on...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Historic mailing list
>> Historic at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20150226/229dbcb8/attachment-0001.html>