[OHM] historic POI tagging

todd.d.robbins at gmail.com todd.d.robbins at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 17:15:41 UTC 2019


Totally agree with Rob on this. POI is reliable for now and add other
metadata in the comment/description fields.

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:05 AM Rob H Warren <warren at muninn-project.org>
wrote:

> Richard,
>
> I think the POI is the way to go; the OSM stack doesn't differentiate
> between feature and geometry which makes modelling uncertainty difficult.
>
> Suggestion: overload the comment, fixme and description tags with whatever
> data you have; it gives you something to work with later on as the stack
> gets more sophisticated. -R
>
>
> > i somewhat arbitrarily started using a node
> > tagged
> >
> > historic=raceway
> > name="....."
> >
> > when all i have is a location without an actual
> > footprint for a historic raceway. anyone have
> > any comments/suggestions?
> >
> > richard
> > --
> > rwelty at averillpark.net
> > Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
> > OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
> > Java - Web Applications - Search
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> Historic at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>


-- 
Tod Robbins, MLIS
todrobbins.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20190904/07314580/attachment.html>


More information about the Historic mailing list