[HOT] Draft Articles of Incorporation/Bylaws
mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 21 03:08:26 BST 2010
Sorry for delay, been offline and then catching up after SOTM
I'm pretty much +1 on moving ahead, but have a couple questions, comments..
For Board elections, under OSMF, we have a rotating election where 1/3 of the
board is up for election each year, with a 3 year term. This ensures some
continuity between elections. Any thoughts on similar for HOT? How is it handled
in OSM US?
Wording: In the By-laws, under Board of Directors, reference to "Chapter" ...
should this rather be "Organization"?
On relationship with an EU entity, starting to get some advice on this, will
== Mikel Maron ==
+254(0)724899738 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>
To: Robert Soden <robert.soden at gmail.com>
Cc: hot <hot at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Thu, July 15, 2010 11:47:02 PM
Subject: Re: [HOT] Draft Articles of Incorporation/Bylaws
We don't need to decide this before incorporation. What we would need
to decide is if these types of people would be separate from the board
of directors. I'm okay with deciding they would be separate and then
if it becomes a problem we can pass an amendment to the bylaws.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Robert Soden <robert.soden at gmail.com> wrote:
> I really like the idea of an advisory board of people who can provide
> strategic advice and assist in funding efforts. Will put some thought into
> ideas for candidates. Do we need to decide this before incorporation?
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com> wrote:
>> So one question came up was what if we wanted to have board members
>> from or connected to large donor organizations? They probably
>> wouldn't be deploying members.
>> Or would we have an advisory board which wouldn't be part of the
>> executive board?
>> On 7/13/10, Robert Soden <robert.soden at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for doing this Kate, they look solid to my non-expert eyes. Is
>> > the
>> > plan to incorporate in D.C. asap or are there still things we need to
>> > figure
>> > out related to incorporating in Europe and how to structure the org?
>> > No strong feelings about membership, but what's the reasoning for the
>> > tiered
>> > approach? I'm trying to come up with an example where we'd want someone
>> > in
>> > as a member but not want them to deploy?
>> > On Jul 12, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
>> >> Hi Hotties!
>> >> I drew up some quick Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation we could use
>> >> to incorporation as a non-profit corporation that would eventually
>> >> have tax exempt status in the U.S. We were thinking our EU bylaws
>> >> would be very similar but of course have the necessary legal country
>> >> specific changes.
>> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/U.S._Bylaws
>> >> I've incorporated 2 non-profits in the District of Columbia so I
>> >> modeled it somewhat after that.
>> >> We weren't really sure how to do membership, what is up there is just
>> >> a suggestion.
>> >> Let me know what you think.
>> >> -Kate
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> HOT mailing list
>> >> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > HOT mailing list
>> > HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT