[HOT] Terminology
Om Goeckermann
om.imap at gmail.com
Wed Jun 20 14:11:58 BST 2012
I think 'grid square' is awkward, and being two words, is unnecessarily long.
How about:
block - individual unit
chunk - sub group of a few blocks
grid - a set of blocks
zone -
region -
Sent from my phone.
May contain incom
plete thoughts.
On Jun 20, 2012, at 7:00, hot-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Send HOT mailing list submissions to
> hot at openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> hot-request at openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> hot-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of HOT digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Tasking Manager - terminology (Pierre GIRAUD)
> 2. Re: Tasking Manager - terminology (Kate Chapman)
> 3. Re: Tasking Manager - terminology (St?phane Henriod)
> 4. Re: Tasking Manager - terminology (Fran Boon)
> 5. Re: Tasking Manager - terminology (Big Fat Frog)
> 6. Membership Survey (Final comments before sending out)
> (Kate Chapman)
> 7. HOT Chat (Kate Chapman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:58:38 +0200
> From: Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com>
> To: HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [HOT] Tasking Manager - terminology
> Message-ID:
> <CAOZv5akZu+YW-9Tbp7z8RLd7dk121DdQXXndPqB+mk-mTA+8Ng at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello all,
>
> I need help to find the correct words for the objects we manipulate in
> the tasking manager.
> It looks like the word "job" is not appropriate. Many people prefer to
> use the word "task" for this.
> Then "task" doesn't mean anything anymore.
> In the mapcraft application, they use "cake" (or pie) and "slice".
>
> I think "slice" is appropriate in our case too.
> What do you think?
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> ? | Pierre GIRAUD
> ? | http://pierrelebricoleur.blogspot.com
> ? | http://www.flickr.com/photos/pierregiraud
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:07:10 +0700
> From: Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>
> To: Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com>
> Cc: HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] Tasking Manager - terminology
> Message-ID:
> <CAGn7mOqbT9Oj22iaRpi1kXToOYoyZnKH5S4zHxnKk6eVmjZVRA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I'm curious why task doesn't mean anything anymore.
>
> Personally I think "grid square" would make sense. "Slice" doesn't
> make sense to me at least not when things are divided into a grid.
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I need help to find the correct words for the objects we manipulate in
>> the tasking manager.
>> It looks like the word "job" is not appropriate. Many people prefer to
>> use the word "task" for this.
>> Then "task" doesn't mean anything anymore.
>> In the mapcraft application, they use "cake" (or pie) and "slice".
>>
>> I think "slice" is appropriate in our case too.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> ? | Pierre GIRAUD
>> ? | http://pierrelebricoleur.blogspot.com
>> ? | http://www.flickr.com/photos/pierregiraud
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:00:48 +0200
> From: St?phane Henriod <s at henriod.info>
> To: Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>
> Cc: HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] Tasking Manager - terminology
> Message-ID:
> <CAK6pVBVWWWnAjfJ9CRNQ0Een5HCnNE=odsFo=PWx4MzuLrSzUA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> What about "zone"?
>
> Maybe more self-explanatory, especially for people not familiar with the
> process and / or with GIS?
>
> --
> "Le mot progr?s n'aura aucun sens tant qu'il y aura des enfants malheureux"
> -- Albert Einstein
>
> "A journey does not need reasons. Before long, it proves to be reason
> enough in itself. One thinks that one is going to make a journey, yet soon
> it is the journey that makes or unmakes you." -- Nicolas Bouvier
>
> Photos de voyages, photos de montagne: http://www.henriod.info
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious why task doesn't mean anything anymore.
>>
>> Personally I think "grid square" would make sense. "Slice" doesn't
>> make sense to me at least not when things are divided into a grid.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I need help to find the correct words for the objects we manipulate in
>>> the tasking manager.
>>> It looks like the word "job" is not appropriate. Many people prefer to
>>> use the word "task" for this.
>>> Then "task" doesn't mean anything anymore.
>>> In the mapcraft application, they use "cake" (or pie) and "slice".
>>>
>>> I think "slice" is appropriate in our case too.
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> | Pierre GIRAUD
>>> | http://pierrelebricoleur.blogspot.com
>>> | http://www.flickr.com/photos/pierregiraud
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20120619/caf867a3/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:03:35 +0100
> From: Fran Boon <francisboon at gmail.com>
> To: St?phane Henriod <s at henriod.info>
> Cc: HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] Tasking Manager - terminology
> Message-ID:
> <CAPKzktLAb9qqm6+PyMnB31EFcQwb8EURNSr4TuEb+X1WoDqXFg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 19 June 2012 20:00, St?phane Henriod <s at henriod.info> wrote:
>> What about "zone"?
>> Maybe more self-explanatory, especially for people not familiar with the
>> process and / or with GIS?
>
> +1 :)
>
> F
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:20:46 +0100
> From: Big Fat Frog <bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com>
> To: HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] Tasking Manager - terminology
> Message-ID: <4FE0FB3E.3010609 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I can't see what's wrong with Task either? Slice definately doesn't fit.
> What are you trying to put a name to? The piece of work or the area
> of the map that's being worked, if it's the former then task is best
> else if it's the latter then zone or grid square is good. Not sure
> what's wrong with Job though!
>
> J
>
> On 19/06/2012 16:07, Kate Chapman wrote:
>> I'm curious why task doesn't mean anything anymore.
>>
>> Personally I think "grid square" would make sense. "Slice" doesn't
>> make sense to me at least not when things are divided into a grid.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Pierre GIRAUD<pierre.giraud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I need help to find the correct words for the objects we manipulate in
>>> the tasking manager.
>>> It looks like the word "job" is not appropriate. Many people prefer to
>>> use the word "task" for this.
>>> Then "task" doesn't mean anything anymore.
>>> In the mapcraft application, they use "cake" (or pie) and "slice".
>>>
>>> I think "slice" is appropriate in our case too.
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> | Pierre GIRAUD
>>> | http://pierrelebricoleur.blogspot.com
>>> | http://www.flickr.com/photos/pierregiraud
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:22:46 +0700
> From: Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>
> To: hot <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [HOT] Membership Survey (Final comments before sending out)
> Message-ID:
> <CAGn7mOoPKb2Z7o+8O5apx24+Qa0eDhot_Po_X7o3jqCJGHRnkg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I went and gave another edit to the Membership survey:
> https://hackpad.com/lD7tOgNVNLR#*HOT-Membership-Survey-Questions
>
> Remember I'm soliciting feedback, this isn't the actual survey you
> would take. I'll send that out in Survey Monkey or something.
>
> Nothing in this survey is a vote, the intent is to help provide
> guidance of what HOT should focus. For example in this survey was are
> not voting on what license we should adopt for data, software, etc.
> I'm looking for input as to if we should have that discussion and
> vote.
>
> The HOT membership is pretty diverse and from a lot of cultural and
> technical backgrounds, so I think it is important if there are issues
> that the group wants to focus on that we have time to discuss and work
> through them before we would have a vote.
>
> Hope that makes sense,
>
> -Kate
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:06:16 +0700
> From: Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>
> To: hot <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [HOT] HOT Chat
> Message-ID:
> <CAGn7mOphfL0cNV0L9N8+t2y1QQxE_d6o-jarUDXxOj0_o=8Lvg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Just a reminder there is a HOT chat tomorrow at 11pm GMT on Wednesday.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/HOT_Chats
>
> Please join if you are able.
>
> We can discuss the proposed survey, the open positions that are
> posted, the upcoming Understanding Risk conference, or anything else
> that people are interested.
>
> Best,
>
> -Kate
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
> End of HOT Digest, Vol 28, Issue 16
> ***********************************
More information about the HOT
mailing list