[HOT] Online 3W for monitoring violence in South Sudan

William Morris wboykinm at geosprocket.com
Sun Dec 29 04:06:40 UTC 2013


Thanks for posting those tasks, Severin.

It seems that the most valuable thing we could do in this case would
be to map the state of the UN compounds in Juba and Bor, but the
available imagery appears to still be under DG copyright, even when
published in a UNOSAT map:
http://unosat-maps.web.cern.ch/unosat-maps/SS/CE20131218SSD/UNOSAT_A4_SitUpdate_Bor_20131223.pdf

Do we have any leads on usable, current imagery?

Also, would anyone object to adding a task for Malakal in Upper Nile
state? It appears to be a contested site
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/world/africa/south-sudan.html?hp),
with a similar IDP presence at a UN compound there.

-Bill


----------
William Morris | Cartographer
(802)-870-0880 | geosprocket.io | GeoSprocket LLC, Burlington VT


On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 7:00 AM,  <hot-request at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Send HOT mailing list submissions to
>         hot at openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         hot-request at openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         hot-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of HOT digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing (Banick, Robert)
>    2. Re: [talk-ph] [IMAGERY] 115 pansharpened WorldView-2 Dec 2013
>       images, 234 pan images available (Jean-Guilhem Cailton)
>    3. Fwd: [CrisisMappers] Online 3W for monitoring violence in
>       South Sudan (Severin MENARD)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:10:38 +0000
> From: "Banick, Robert" <Robert.Banick at redcross.org>
> To: Severin MENARD <severin.menard at gmail.com>, "hot at openstreetmap.org"
>         <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
> Message-ID: <CEE1B184.1C720%robert.banick at redcross.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi All,
>
> I proposed the switch to a "damage=" tag to this community about a month ago and received a positive response, albeit from few voices. When I brought this up again at SOTM-PH it was also well received. As such I think we should switch to using the "damage=" tagging schema and move away from tagging damages in the building tag.
>
> The rendering on this may lag at the moment but is easy enough to catch up - Yohan has already signaled that he can switch quickly.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
>
> Robert Banick | Field GIS Coordinator | International Services | ? American Red Cross<http://www.redcross.org/>
> 2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
> Tel 202-303-5017 | Cell 202-805-3679 | Skype robert.banick
>
> From: Severin MENARD <severin.menard at gmail.com<mailto:severin.menard at gmail.com>>
> Date: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 1:14 PM
> To: "hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>" <hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>>
> Subject: [HOT] New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
>
> Hi,
>
> Wanting to contribute to the post-disaster assessments in Philippines, I read the discussion about tags and rendering. As Pierre's tip about the mapcss was useful for everyone, I added it in the workflow tab in the job I wanted to contribute (http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/360). Would be good to have a defintive statement regarding Jonathan's questions and put it in the workflow as well, so that there is no doubt about the tagging.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Severin
>
>
>
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:42:29 +0000
> From: Jonathan <bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com<mailto:bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com>>
> To: hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] [talk-ph]  New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
> Message-ID: <52B5B6E5.5020505 at gmail.com<mailto:52B5B6E5.5020505 at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> Excellent heads up with this styesheet.
>
> It has highlighted to me a possible confusion I have.
>
> There are 3 building scenarios as I understand it: 1. Undamaged Building
> 2. Damaged Building 3. Destroyed Building
>
> The tagging I understand for those three are:
>
> 1. Undamaged Building
> building=yes
> typhoon:reviewed=yes
>
> 2. Damaged Building
> damage=damaged
> typhoon:reviewed=yes
>
> 3. Destroyed Building
> damage=total
> typhoon:reviewed=yes
>
> So, in 2 & 3 there is no longer a [building] tag and the stylesheet
> paints it Green.  In 1 there is no [damage] tag but the stylesheet
> doesn't paint it green even though it has [typhoon:reviewed] tag?
>
> Any ideas. Thanks
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20131226/032de443/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:54:22 +0100
> From: Jean-Guilhem Cailton <jgc at arkemie.com>
> To: osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
> Cc: "HOT at OSM \(Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team\)"
>         <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] [talk-ph] [IMAGERY] 115 pansharpened WorldView-2
>         Dec 2013 images, 234 pan images available
> Message-ID: <52BC5F3E.5050002 at arkemie.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> 234 panchromatic WorldView-2 images of the Visayas regions (over Agutaya
> and Cuyo Islands, Panay Island, Guimaras Island, Masbate Island,
> Tacloban, Eastern Samar, Suluan Island, Dinagat) taken mostly in
> December and November 2013, but also in March 2013 (6 of them), July
> 2012 (7) and November 2011 (6); and 115 of them in pansharpened "natural
> colors" taken in December 2013 are available.
>
> They are under the NextView license, which you must accept before
> accessing them.
>
> They are available both as two layers in the WMS server, and as two TMS
> layers. Their JOSM URLs are:
>
> tms[23]:http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/batch20131226_wv2_pan/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
> tms[23]:http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/batch20131226_wv2_pxs/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
>
> Use source=WorldView-2, DigitalGlobe, NextView
>
> As usual, check imagery offset before tracing. These images did include
> RPCs (which made pansharpening possible).
>
> They were processed (and are hosted) on a server donated to
> OpenStreetMap France by Fondation d'Entreprise Free, using GDAL and
> Orfeo Toolbox free software.
>
> Many thanks to DigitalGlobe, USGS, HDDS and to all those who contributed
> to make them available.
>
> Happy season's mapping,
>
> Jean-Guilhem
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSvF8+AAoJEMtWR+JOGYzsRJIQAKErtEbMc82f35jYEVncUh1f
> Jsix4r6MNsWO2Fy4wIzUgBNaqcrTGH5UgQuzUcejMPect9l3QZRwiJs6I5aejD3S
> 041n241CFLF46V7ez4W7EruzC2j1AYlTjH6FrsVUUalXGba8h1rf0e2OHBE0l546
> DeKYj0xZMsYqO/FlG1a4dMNBoZmaaSoXAa5QMGBAeLMjDM82D5Ar5jJZMqNxUsXZ
> 8JCymA/L8TT3E4pVGA0MFlfz/vYfRneOLqdbHbR/ZidZ83LiVjYinMnRh+x+XVVv
> 1WD9L7vfC8PzRmyqp/4yO8yWa69inLTXsBh2Xs5qZ8eqHdmW/fRJmGxXnJho87YX
> V+rRriSCRoRuWIkpsWagi1csq8JSWPrvnmd2vixmLfYPx49uuIbcNt6n9FyUKByS
> Hh/cNn1wQa6iCkz7TyKen0Lzy119fQAdmkxJkydvsF5EbNTailWBGlK/6FChA1Sb
> czajlMHXcegX3Y9y79jWJ6ZUXqYmdpG1V5FRFsZHHToM/EEaaW1d2xnrw8vHMzFC
> LhhCiVvlo+GEieXSSUHkpfceWzZE0w1lJ6R+Br9mth5Xxw+LHPIfN7xc/VO8WAvg
> G/5zFUsKAxScbpGhdJAgQRUKMlqzB+9lvgfHYN3IEHrv9i2QHygdH07gJKReZj2+
> KRHUwb5t928ergD2f3HR
> =59+t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 02:19:49 +0100
> From: Severin MENARD <severin.menard at gmail.com>
> To: "hot at openstreetmap.org" <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [HOT] Fwd: [CrisisMappers] Online 3W for monitoring violence
>         in      South Sudan
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+y5pBKtRwQxdGYmxdgb1Nf+V-CzH5xUjgHZ8NY4o0MEwNboVQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find here
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_SouthSudan>the updated
> OSM Wikipage about South Sudan, listing the HOT Tasking Manager
> jobs that have been created in order to map the cities of Bor, Bentiu,
> Mundri and Juba. They can also be accessed through this
> umap<http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/south-sudan-crisis-mapping-objectives_3604#6/7.264/31.564>
> .
> It is not (yet) a HOT Activation, but HOT Monitoring, and no UN
> organization or NGO has made an official request for OSM mapping so far. We
> hope such official requests to come as they would be very useful to get a
> larger response from the OSM community. Recent imagery could be available
> soon.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Severin
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20131227/f8dbccc3/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
> End of HOT Digest, Vol 46, Issue 62
> ***********************************



More information about the HOT mailing list