[HOT] What is the etiquette on breaking up tasks? (New Mapper working on Nepal #1018)
sbower at gmavt.net
Sun May 10 22:56:04 UTC 2015
Tom - Another option is to leave a comment if you plan to return to the
tile within, say, several to 12 hours. I have done that because I find I'm
more efficient once I've become familiar with a tile (which imagery has
good enough quality to help with interpretation, where the roads & rivers
are, how existing OSM features were mapped by others before me, etc.).
Familiarity with the tile makes me more efficient, so I prefer not to break
it up if I know I can come back and finish it.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Nirab Pudasaini <developer.nirab at gmail.com>
> Hi tom,
> If you are having hard time completing a task it is a good idea to break
> it up, but just dont get carried away. :D
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Tom Ayerst <tom.ayerst at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am finding it hard to finish a task at the current tile size (even the
>> smaller ones) and would find it easier to break them down into much smaller
>> tasks that I can concentrate on and complete ready for validation. At the
>> moment I am have to go back to a tile several times to get close to
>> Is there an etiquette about this? Are validators happy to work at a finer
>> level of granularity? Or does this make something else harder?
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT