[HOT] Getting Familiar With OSM (Was: Level of user experience to focus on)
russell.deffner at hotosm.org
Fri May 29 15:39:03 UTC 2015
Oh, and a little back-story on the Phillip S. Miller park mapping if you're interested how we (typically) organize local stuff: http://www.meetup.com/OSM-Colorado/events/219878946/
From: Russell Deffner [mailto:Russell.Deffner at hotosm.org]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:21 AM
To: 'Shelby Canterford'; Springfield Harrison (stellargps at gmail.com)
Cc: 'hot OpenStreetMap Team)'; Suzan Reed (suzan at suzanreed.com)
Subject: RE: [HOT] Getting Familiar With OSM (Was: Level of user experience to focus on)
Here are some snippets from this conversation I would like to address:
* I would actually like a test/mentoring system, then at least I would know if I'm rubbish or not!
* When I came on board, I wondered why there weren't learning materials I had to study, and then a test to be sure I was ready to map.
* I also wondered why I was able to contribute to any task instead to being routed to tasks meant especially for newcomers, with a mentoring team watching over my work, giving me suggestions for improvements.
* Required reading and a mapping test?
These are common 'misunderstanding' with OpenStreetMap. When I first found OSM it was a basemap in another software, but what really caught my attention was how horribly mapped my home town was. So I went searching on the internet, learned a tiny bit about the project itself - but also found a local OSM group. So what did I do, I basically approached them with the mentality that 'they would fix this for me, right?' - totally wrong - what they did was empower me to fix it myself. Not exactly what I had hoped, but in the long-run; the much better solution.
And that leads to answering a few of those questions above - why is there 'no one watching your work' - actually there are, millions of them. Maybe not specifically looking at that last thing you traced and providing direct feedback; but eventually everything in OSM will get 'peer reviewed', and reviewed again - and ran through a dozen QA tools - and further edited; and so on and so forth. There are NO barriers to entry in OSM; that is probably one thing that is quite confusing to anyone unfamiliar with the Open Source concept. Much like Wikipedia, you don't need to be a published author or go through some vetting system in order to contribute; that's the point - we want everyone in the world to be able to contribute.
All that said, we built LearnOSM.org to provide those learning materials - sure, much like OSM, it isn't complete; and we continue to work on improvements. And originally the Tasking Manager did not have a validation system; no it does, and problems have been pointed out, and we're working to improve it.
There were also some comments around 'volunteer satisfaction' - not that I want to take you away from HOT - but back to my 'intro to OSM' story - nothing is more satisfying than getting your local neighborhood onto OSM and showing where 'the big time map providers' are way behind: http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#15/39.3681/-104.8825&num=4&mt0=mapnik&mt1=cyclemap&mt2=bing-map&mt3=google-map
Russell.Deffner at hotosm.org
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT)
More information about the HOT