[HOT] Tagging hut=yes
courtneyclark8 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 00:58:50 UTC 2015
I agree with Suzan and Jorieke, both in general and specifically as someone
closely involved with the project around task 1034. While this issue may
still be in discussion among the HOT community, I can say that for this
project, the simple building tag is preferred instead of hut.
Thank you, Chris, both for asking this question and for helping with our
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015, Suzan Reed <suzan at suzanreed.com> wrote:
> In many countries people’s houses, churches, workshops and other buildings
> are round, not square. Or, a building can be a combination of round and
> square. So tagging should be building=yes. Just because a building is round
> does not make it a “hut”, whatever that means. It’s a home, church, or
> industrial building same as if it were square.
> Two cents from me.
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Jorieke Vyncke <jorieke.vyncke at gmail.com
> Hi all,
> Just giving my two cents.
> For me mapping a building like a hut does not signify a lot.
> What is exactly a hut? Is it just a round building? Round buildings
> can be made out of several materials and have several different
> functions. Also why would a round building get another tag if a square
> building is almost the same size, made out of the same materials and
> has the same function?
> What significant is for me, is that it is a house, a granary or a roof
> to hide against the sun. Also the material of what it is made of is
> significant: roof out of straw or metal, walls out of bricks or clay
> ... In my opinion drawing a circle and tagging it with building = yes
> , and potentially other tags is the best.
> For me mapping buildings as huts doesn't signify a lot, on the
> contrary, I don't know what people who are living in the mapped 'huts'
> will think of it that their house is mapped like a 'hut'. I suppose it
> depends on how 'huts' are perceived in every culture. So yes also for
> this reason I prefer mapping: building=yes.
> Like I said, just my two cents :-)
> Best greetings,
> > The HOT convention seems to be tag them building=yes. OSM and HOT are
> > slightly different in OSM it is acceptable to tag a node rather than the
> > HOT convention circle. Because HOT has a lot of very new mappers and
> > work is validated ie often corrected I think it is important to clarify
> > this.
> > Also the training material needs to be considered, having one answer in
> > place and having the training material say something else would be
> > Cheerio John
> > On 28 September 2015 at 22:29, Dale Kunce <dale.kunce at gmail.com
> >> Chris,
> >> I would use the more widely used tag building=hut.
> >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hut#values
> >> Dale
> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, chris zontine <chriszontine at icloud.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> Greetings.
> >>> I was involved in mapping task 1034 and a fellow mapper mentioned they
> >>> used the tag hut=yes in place of building=yes. I looked up the use of
> >>> key
> >>> hut and apparently it is used but in very limited circumstances.
> >>> The mapper said it was used to map a circular structure so I presume
> >>> usage was correct. Given the lack of general use what is the consensus
> >>> on
> >>> using this tag?
> >>>  http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hut)
> >>> Chris Zontine
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> HOT mailing list
> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> >> --
> >> sent from my mobile device
> >> Dale Kunce
> >> http://normalhabit.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> HOT mailing list
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> HOT mailing list
> HOT mailing list
Innovation Fellow, Peace Corps
Returned Peace Corps Volunteer, Guinea 2012-2014
Loyola University Chicago
231-740-9595 | courtneyclark8 at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT